![]() Sometimes it surprises me and kills a tier 3 unit from full HP in a single turn. Originally posted by sandman25dcsss:Which difficulty are you playing on? In my experience AI is quite good at focus fire, often it gets attacked with several opprtunity attacks just to reach and kill a wounded unit in your back line. My hypothesis is that maybe the AI does an intentionally bad job to disuade you from automating, but I don't know. So what's the deal? Was it just my bad luck? Would it be better if I just simulated the battle entirely rather than have the AI control the units in the tactical map? As I said, this was my first game, and while I think the game is very intuitive, it's not like I became a tactical genius in my first round. On manual, I even managed to win some marked as "probable defeat" (which I took because I was the one being attacked). And even on those, if I replayed it, I got much better kill ratio than the AI. Every time I just loaded and did it myself because I lost pretty much every battle except the "very likely victory" ones. I only did this on battles with "Closely Matched" or better odds (always offensive sieges, though). Since I wanted to see the battle unfold cause it looks cool I selected manual combat, but then I let the AI take over using the "auto" option inside the tactical map. I wasn't sure about the outcome so I always saved right before attacking. So, I eagerly played my first few battles in manual, but then after a while I decided why not automate the process. ![]() I noticed something interesting though, and I wonder if others have noticed, especially older players. Honestly I'm very pleased with this acquisition. Ok, just finished my first random map (yes, I got it during the giveaway).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |